Darwin's theory of Evolution

The really HOT topics of the day... be careful to not get burned! Please try to remain open minded...

Moderator: The Moderating Team

Post Reply

Do you believe Darwin's theory of Evolution?

Yes
7
54%
No
5
38%
Partially
1
8%
Don't Know
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 13

User avatar
BAC8687
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Europe

Darwin's theory of Evolution

Post by BAC8687 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:33 am

Do you believe it?
"The future is just not what it used to be"

User avatar
cwbjr67
All Star
All Star
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 1:54 pm
Location: North Beach MD

Re: Darwin's theory of Evolution

Post by cwbjr67 » Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:48 am

The danger in evolution is not so much in the scientific explanation of how creation came about and progressed. It's in its misuse to justify an amoral worldview.
GO CADETS!
Image
Image

User avatar
JorbMorb
New Recruit
New Recruit
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:09 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Darwin's theory of Evolution

Post by JorbMorb » Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:25 am

cwbjr67 wrote:The danger in evolution is not so much in the scientific explanation of how creation came about and progressed. It's in its misuse to justify an amoral worldview.
SO true!

User avatar
CFI BLOOO
All Star
All Star
Posts: 715
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 8:34 pm
Location: Dansville, NY
Contact:

Re: Darwin's theory of Evolution

Post by CFI BLOOO » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:07 am

The one issue that most people ignore about Darwin... is the suggestion that the evidence found in genetic natural selection of traits is actually evidence for evolution across species (one species becomes another over time).

It is humorous to look at the VERY BEST exhibits to be found in the very best museums, research reports and press releases and to realize how much of it is 'artist rendering'. Whereas the ACTUAL evidence in the very best exhibits (i.e. the fossils, bones, rock layer formations, and physical mutations) suggest only that physical changes are exclusive to a species line (i.e. there used to be BIG 7 gilled sharks... now there are smaller 5 gilled sharks. / There used to be big, ugly wolf dogs... now there are chihauhuas / There used to be big woolly mammoths with long hair... now there are smaller elephants with shorter hair. The same can be said for the full spectrum of dinosaurs... where as a specific species may now be extinct (as is the case with a number of species of nearly every animal family). The indication is that there used to be fewer genetic examples of a every species... and now there are many (duh. It doesn't take much thought to understand the chronology of events and the obvious outcomes here).

The gag here is that one does not have to believe in Darwin's theory... and accept all of these above facts as being true. This kind of genetic trait selection is and continues to be observable in all living species today. The problem is that many of these observable and factual representations in contemporary life and fossilized evidence are used to fabricate a plethora of assumptions. As the saying goes... you can make the rocks say whatever you want them to say. But the evidence tells a much different, and much more clear tale.

Darwin's theory is fantasy. Not only do the facts not support it... they don't even begin to point in that direction. The element that establishes the theory is the existence of a simple fantastic assumption that 'these examples of genetic selection cause one species to become another'

But... a simple fantastic assumption... is fiction. It's the stuff that typical epic movies are made of.
Nothing is too difficult... only time consuming.

Post Reply